PDA

View Full Version : Professional bowling tours seeking recognition


BubbaRay
04-30-2009, 09:05 AM
Posted by Jeff Bleiler | Citizen Patriot April 22, 2009 05:03AM

On Friday evening at Airport Lanes, a man wandered the concourse wearing a long-sleeve, dark blue plaid shirt tucked into his blue jeans.

Nothing out of the ordinary about a sight like that, except that this guy was famous.

And he went largely unnoticed by a good-sized crowd of league and open bowlers.

The man was PBA Hall of Famer Mark Williams, and his anonymity was a troubling offshoot of the Senior Professional Bowlers Association's visit to Jackson.

Williams is not the most recognizable figure, and Brian Voss or Johnny Petraglia may have turned more heads.

But the guy won seven PBA titles and looks a lot like he did back when he was doing it.

Lack of star recognition is just one of the many challenges facing the senior and regular tours as the sport attempts to gain a following similar to the one it enjoyed when the late Chris Schenkel and Nelson Burton Jr. held court on Saturday afternoons on ABC.

Petraglia, one of the tour's most recognizable names, pondered the issues facing the sport before competing in the final rounds of the PBA Jackson Open on Tuesday.

"The tour is doing good, and the senior tour is doing good, but if the sport is going to improve, it has to be done by the industry," Petraglia said. "All the other sports invest money in their professionals, so that if you're successful, it's life-changing. The same thing has to happen with our sport.

"If the leading money-winner was making seven figures, they'd have so many juniors out here they wouldn't know what to do with them."

Ron Mohr won the Jackson tournament and an $8,000 check. Winners on the regular tour claim between $25,000 and $35,000 per tournament. Majors are worth $100,000.

By comparison, the winner of the last PGA Tour stop, Brian Gay, took home a shade more than $1 million.

And when the stakes are that high, television audiences flock to it.

"I do it," Petraglia said. "I'll watch a guy play golf, and I know that if a new, up-and-comer makes a putt and wins a tournament, his life is set for a few years. I've thrown shots for $100,000, and I've thrown shots for $10,000, and there's a tremendous difference."

Money aside, bowling also suffers from a perception that anyone can do what the professionals do. League bowlers regularly hit fat scores on candy house patterns, while the pros — this tournament aside — battle difficult oil patterns that change quicker than house shots.

The resulting lower scores make Joe Bowler think he can do as well if not better.

That's not lost on the pros, including PBA Hall of Famer Tom Baker.

"The tours showcase just how good PBA bowlers are," Baker said as he sipped red wine in the Airport Lanes bar several hours after his tournament ended in the round of 24. "The regular bowler, he would struggle out here. A guy who averages 230 in leagues thinks he can come out here on tour, and he can't.

"We don't have the respect. It's been a struggling sport forever."

Petraglia has a solution, and it doesn't involve gimmick tournaments like the ones the PBA rolled out for the regular tour this past season. He proposes a $5 increase in the $15 United States Bowling Congress joining fee that all sanctioned bowlers must pay. The additional $5 would be earmarked for televised tournaments only.

The $5 increase would generate roughly $25 million, given current levels of USBC membership. That money could easily fatten prize funds for televised tournaments, which could attract more sponsors and entries and help get bowling on par with other sports.

Five dollars seems a small price to pay to give professional bowlers the respect they deserve.

© 2009 Michigan Live. All Rights Reserved.

excalibur
04-30-2009, 10:38 AM
I dont have tons of extra money lying around but I would do that to help grow the sport.

Young300
04-30-2009, 12:33 PM
Agreed, $5 isn't much to pay to improve the life of the sport.

BubbaRay
04-30-2009, 01:10 PM
Someone called and asked the USBC about the sanction fee increase to the USBC to see if Mr. Petraglias' idea garnered any support. And, unfortunately, every one of them at the USBC answered with a very resounding NO. first off, the replies indicated that ANY new sanction fee hike would be ridiculous, considering USBC has already 'been there, done that'.

But we all know that didn't have a problem raising ythe sanction fee when they were building their new building in Texas and also the testing center. Do as we say not as we do is their motto.

Jermarace Miller
04-30-2009, 11:45 PM
The USBC usually contradicts what they say and do. Example the new building and training center. They did not mind rasing prices to fund their new laz-z-boys in their offices yet we cannot raise the price to help fuel the sport and give it some recognition. I do not know why they do this or why they think bowling is at a point were people should know it. The NFL,MLB, and the NBA brodcast everyday about the sport yet PBA only brodcast sunday eventhough they still have tournaments though out the week on ESPN which no one knows about unless they knew about it before.

TenPinSniper
05-01-2009, 01:13 AM
Wow this one amazes me... it a different interation of something I've heard in the past.

Let me correct a few things... the "HQ" is not a new building. The Training Center is a new building.

The problem the PBA has is it does not attract the right sponsers with enough money to make the Prize Funds rich enough.

Sancation Fees are used to run programs, not grow prize funds. The USBC is already funding the Team USA Programs as well as the Women's Series. Think we are doing more than our part.

Think Pro Bowler's need to be able to hunt down their own sponser's... maybe have sell exposer on the Spare Ball, Shirt Sleeves, etc... just like Nascar. Keep a dress code.... Slacks, Polo's, Mocks, Sport Shirts all the stuff like they have now.

Let all of the players give interviews, win or lose. Time to give the sponser some air time. That and they could talk about why thr match, what balls and layouts used, etc... yeah this would require some more airtime.

Just my .02 cents

Young300
05-01-2009, 08:31 PM
From a lot of the things that I have dealt with on the local and national level with USBC, they just seem like they are a bunch of hypocrites. Too often do I hear of them making changes/rules that they believe to be for the better of the game, but I have yet to see any of it really make a big impact on the sport of bowling if anything. I don't like how USBC is running everything from the youth level to the international level, but just one opinion isn't going to change anything as they are always looking at making more money from some way or another.

idlehourlegend
05-01-2009, 09:13 PM
From a lot of the things that I have dealt with on the local and national level with USBC, they just seem like they are a bunch of hypocrites. Too often do I hear of them making changes/rules that they believe to be for the better of the game, but I have yet to see any of it really make a big impact on the sport of bowling if anything. I don't like how USBC is running everything from the youth level to the international level, but just one opinion isn't going to change anything as they are always looking at making more money from some way or another.

I second that...